On the night of November 16, 1989,
members of the Atlacatl Battalion, an elite corps of the Salvadoran army,
invaded the residence of the Jesuit faculty of the Romero Center at the
University of Central America (UCA) and slaughtered six teaching scholars, along
with their housekeeper and her daughter.
Only Fr. Jon Sobrino, who was out of the country at the time, was spared
from the massacre.
By that time civil war had raged in
El Salvador for nearly a decade.
Strongly influenced by a Cold War mentality that viewed as a communist
plot any attempt by the poor of Latin America to overthrow oppressive regimes,
the U.S. was then funding the Salvadoran military at approximately one million
dollars per day. Some of that went to
equip the death squads. Much of the rest
lined the pockets of corrupt military leaders.
Indeed, military officers were fast becoming the new wealthy power in
the country, challenging the traditional oligarchy referred to as “the fourteen
families.”
In the immediate aftermath of the
murders a number of religious leaders known to be outspoken in their support of
justice for the poor were persuaded, for the sake of their own safety, to leave
El Salvador for a time. At the end of
January 1990, twenty-five years ago as I write this, nearly 2,000 religiously
motivated peace activists crowded into a Roman Catholic church in downtown
Washington, D.C., to pray and sing together and to hear from several of the
pastors and priests who had taken temporary refuge among sympathetic
communities in the United States. We
were encouraged to do all that we could to convince our Congress to stop the
military funding. We were also
challenged to travel to El Salvador ourselves, for the need for international
witnesses was great.
As I learned later that year when I
made the first of what would turn out to be five short-term visits to El
Salvador, the emphasis on the church of the poor crossed and overrode
denominational boundaries. Roman
Catholic priests who ministered with campesinos struggling for justice and an
end to the conflict which was devastating their land were more akin to Lutheran
ministers and Baptist pastors laboring in similar ways than they were to, for
example, the Catholic Bishop of San Miguel, who had allied himself with the
military and was seen more often in uniform than in his clerical robes.
At the beginning of his ministry in
Nazareth Jesus proclaimed that he had come to fulfill what was written by the
prophet Isaiah, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me
to bring good news to the poor. He has
sent me to proclaim release to the captives, and recovery of sight to the
blind, to let the oppressed go free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”
(Luke 4:18-19) This gospel message had
been articulated as the church’s “preferential option for the poor” and applied
specifically to the circumstances in many Latin American countries by
statements issued at a conference of Roman Catholic bishops held in Medellin, Columbia,
in 1968. In turn the statements
developed at Medellin became one of the roots of the movement known as Latin
American Liberation Theology.
It was this understanding of the
gospel on which Archbishop Oscar Romero had drawn in his last public sermon,
just one day before he was assassinated while saying mass in the chapel of
Divine Providence Hospital in San Salvador.
Speaking directly to the military, Romero proclaimed: “I want to make a
special appeal to soldiers, national guardsmen, and policemen: each of you is one
of us. The peasants you kill are your own brothers and sisters. When you hear a
man telling you to kill, remember God’s words, ‘thou shalt not kill.’ No
soldier is obliged to obey a law contrary to the law of God. In the name of
God, in the name of our tormented people, I beseech you, I implore you; in the
name of God I command you to stop the repression.”
This portrait of Oscar Romero was attacked with a flame thrower by the assassins during the massacre at the UCA. The "drapery" on either side of the frame is melted glass. |
Those who preach against violence and
oppression, and for justice for the poor, are regularly labeled “communist” by
the powers who profit from oppression and injustice. Dom Hélder Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and
Recife, Brazil, from 1964 to 1985, observed, “When I give food to the poor,
they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a
communist.” The term serves as an all-purpose
pejorative to marginalize and demonize both the message and the messenger. Too often, as I have detailed here, it has
also provided justification for assassination.
Thus I watch with both admiration and
concern the path that Pope Francis is taking.
He has been far more outspoken than recent past Catholic Popes in
calling to account both the world’s economic systems and abuses within the
church he leads. In refusing many of the
trappings and luxuries of his office, he models a life of simplicity and
solidarity with the poor. He has made
strides in cleaning house of corruption in the Vatican bank. And he has been increasingly vocal in
criticizing the global financial system.
With the recent publication of a
study of Francis’ economic and social teachings titled “Pope Francis: This
Economy Kills” by Andrea Tornielli and Giacomo Galeazzi, the voices of critics
labeling Francis “Marxist” and “Communist” have become louder and more
shrill. In response, Francis has
remarked, “Jesus states that we cannot serve two masters, God and wealth…. If I repeated some passages from the homilies
of the Church Fathers, in the second or third century, about how we must treat
the poor, some would accuse me of giving a Marxist homily.”
Francis can be and is quite properly
criticized in areas of injustice where he supports the status quo, but
regarding the idolatry of wealth and the destructiveness of economic
inequality, his is a clear prophetic voice providing a much-needed corrective both
to the gross distortions of the so-called “prosperity gospel” and other popular
corruptions of Jesus’ message, and to the increasingly unequal secular society
in which we live. As we look back to
remember the sacrifices and martyrs of the past, let us also look forward with
determination to live the good news that Christ proclaimed, working for a just
and equitable world where all, and especially the poor among us, may flourish.
A footnote: Within the past week Francis has declared Oscar Romero to be a martyr. This is a beginning step in the process of officially naming Romero as a saint of the church. The people of El Salvador, of course, have long since acknowledged his sainthood.
Great article. I couldn't agree with it more. Thanks for the historical context.
ReplyDelete