The Christian Bible is considered to
be one of the best-selling books of all time.
Though accurate figures are impossible to compile, there is no doubt
that hundreds of thousands, if not millions of volumes are sold each year. One translation alone, the New International Version, has seen more than 400 million copies in print worldwide since its
introduction in the 1970s.
Despite its ubiquity in the culture,
however, Americans in general, and American Christians in particular, are not
especially well-informed about the contents of the Bible. The Pew Forum, which is noted for its polling
and statistics-gathering on matters religious, completed a survey in 2010 about
religious knowledge among U.S. residents.
Seven questions in the survey focused specifically on very basic Bible
knowledge. For the total number of all
respondents completing the survey, the average correct out of seven was 4.1;
for Christians, the average was only a tenth of a point higher, at 4.2. Best overall group score was achieved by Mormons
at 5.7, followed by White Evangelical Protestants at 5.1. Lowest scores came from Hispanic Catholics at
2.4 and Unaffiliated-Nothing in Particular at 3.2.
Perhaps surprisingly, the group
identified as Unaffiliated-Atheist/Agnostic scored higher at 4.4 than the
Christian average. This may indicate
that the majority of atheists and agnostics have arrived at their beliefs, not
through ignorance, but with a clear understanding of what they are rejecting. But that’s a topic for another column.
Very briefly, then, what’s in the
Bible and how did it come to be? First
of all, it is more appropriate to think of the Bible as a library rather than
as a single work. Many of the books
included in it had a separate existence before they were all gathered together
in one volume. And the writing of them
spans more than 800 years, while the earliest fragments represent an oral tradition
that predates the written version by another few hundred years, at least.
The books that are officially
accepted as scripture are referred to as the canon. The Christian Old Testament (O.T.) is basically
equivalent to the Jewish canon, called the Tanakh, which was standardized in
the early part of the second century C.E.
The order and divisions of the
texts differ considerably between the O.T. and the Tanakh, however. Both collections begin with the Pentateuch,
or the Five Books of Moses – Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and
Deuteronomy. This first section is
called in the Hebrew scriptures The Torah, or The Law.
The second section of the Tanakh,
known as The Prophets, includes Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Twelve. Note
that Samuel and Kings are not divided, as they are in the O.T., and that the
twelve short prophetic books at the end of the O.T. are consolidated in the
Tanakh into one book. When Jesus speaks
of “all the Law and the Prophets” in Matthew 22:40 and elsewhere, he is
referring to these first two sections of Hebrew scripture.
The final section, called The
Writings, consists of the remaining eleven books, with Ezra-Nehemiah and
Chronicles each counted as just one book.
This is a far more diverse collection of topics and styles than were the
first two sections, including as it does the Psalms – hymns and liturgies to be
used in temple worship; wisdom sayings such as those found in Proverbs,
Lamentations, and Ecclesiastes; the lovely short stories of Ruth and Esther;
and the historical material of Ezra-Nehemiah and Chronicles. Rounding out the collection are the
apocalyptic book of Daniel, with its visions and fanciful tales; the intense
theological debate on the problem of evil, framed in an ancient folk tale,
found in the book of Job; and the sensual love poetry of the Song of Solomon.
The general scholarly consensus is that
the oral history maintained in the tribes of Israel began to take written form
during the early monarchy, that is, the roughly hundred-year span between circa
1025 B.C.E. and c. 928 B.C.E. in which Kings Saul, David, and Solomon ruled
over the combined kingdom. The “book of
the law,” the discovery of which sparked the reforms under King Josiah c. 621
B.C.E., was most likely a portion of what is now called the book of
Deuteronomy.
The first stage of compilation of
what are considered in the O.T. to be the “history” books, running from Joshua
through Esther, also took place during the time of King Josiah. Drawing on both earlier writings and oral
tradition, the Deuteronomic editors assembled the faith story of the Hebrew
people from the death of Moses through the period of the Judges and into the
age of the monarchs. A second stage of
compilation was accomplished during the Babylonian exile in the mid-6th
century B.C.E. Chronicles, which repeats
much of the material in the earlier histories, and Ezra-Nehemiah, were
completed after the return from exile.
There is some linguistic and textual evidence that these two books (four
in the O.T.) are the work of the same hand.
With a very few exceptions, the
language of the Old Testament is Ancient Hebrew. The exceptions are portions of Daniel and
Ezra, and one verse in Jeremiah, which are written in Aramaic, the common
language of Jesus’ day. This shift in
language provides strong evidence for a late date for these particular
passages.
After the Babylonian and later the
Persian exiles, more and more Jews found themselves living outside of the land
of Israel. With the ascendency of the
Greek empire, Greek became the language of commerce throughout the ancient
Mediterranean area. Many of the children
of Israel began to lose their native Hebrew language. During the third century B.C.E. a team of
Jewish scholars working in Egypt prepared a Greek translation of the Hebrew
text. Known as the Septuagint, this
Greek translation became the primary source for knowledge of the O.T. among
early Christians, especially those who were not Jewish in origin.
Though standardization of the Tanakh
would not be fully accomplished for another two hundred years, with the preparation
of the Septuagint, the texts that would eventually become the Christian Old
Testament were essentially complete. In another post I’ll continue the story with an examination of the
inter-testamental books known as the Apocrypha, and the New Testament.
No comments:
Post a Comment