In recent months I have been reading
with deep concern about the acceleration of anthropogenic (human-caused)
climate change. Many Christian
denominations, driven by their understanding of stewardship and care of creation,
are now turning their attention to what is happening to our planet. Some are engaged in advocacy to curb the human
activities which are rapidly changing the make-up of our atmosphere. Others are focused more on ministering with
those – many of them in poor, developing countries – who are most likely to
suffer from the effects of climate change.
Still others are participating in preparations, such as the Transition
Towns movement, which will assist communities in adapting to a changed world.
Opposed to these efforts, however,
are other Christian groups which not only deny the reality of climate change
but are also actively opposing any efforts to prepare communities or to make
the necessary alterations in our lives which may help to slow its acceleration
and mitigate its effects. In my reading,
then, I have been trying to understand the reasoning and the theology behind
these oppositional forces. There seems
to be a number of underlying causes involved.
First is the persistent strand of
anti-intellectualism that has been part of the American persona since the early
days of colonization. In a land where
manual skills were foremost in assuring survival, a life devoted to scholarship
was a luxury only the upper class could afford.
Frequently members of that upper class were also part of the oppressor
class, the landlords and overseers who made a difficult life even more of a
struggle. Resentment against the highly educated
was not difficult to find in the early years of the U.S. It persists to this day, as evidenced by
derogatory remarks made by public figures about the “intellectual elite” and a
widespread distrust of “experts.” We see
it in the strangely dichotomous attitude which maintains that U.S. universities
provide the finest education in the world, yet rejects the research results
produced by graduates and professors at those very universities.
Second is a deep, and seemingly
unbridgeable, divide regarding the nature of the universe between
climatologists, who are providing our research, and that segment of literalist
Christians who believe earth to be only six to ten thousand years old. Recent polling consistently shows that 40% to
46% of the U.S. population believes that humans were created by God within the
past ten millennia. Though few of these
polls ask a separate question regarding belief in when the earth itself came
into being, literature from those termed Young Earth Creationists generally
assumes a literal six-day creation as described in the first chapter of
Genesis, with planet and all living beings on it coming into existence within a
week’s time.
For those who hold such beliefs, consideration
of geological time in terms of millions and billions of years is no more “real”
than is the wonderland that Alice found when she tumbled down the rabbit hole. In order to have a fruitful discussion
regarding the causes and effects of climate change, it is necessary to have
some baseline of agreement on the underlying science. Sadly, these two cosmological views are so
diametrically opposite each other that anything more than superficial
conversation is rarely possible.
A third factor is the belief that God
is good and God gave us the planet, so we can do whatever we like with it and
no harm will come. The Cornwall
Alliance, founded by Calvin Beisner to bring together major Religious Right
leaders in opposition to the environmental movement, has produced a DVD series
titled “Resisting the Green Dragon.” In it are claims that global warming is a hoax
and environmentalism is a religion in competition with Christianity. Anti-environmentalism is coupled with an
extreme libertarian capitalism to advocate for consumption of resources,
including burning of fossil fuels, at or above current levels, and to deny that
any harm can come from maintaining the status quo.
We enjoy religious freedom in the
U.S. There are no legal sanctions for
heresy, and restrictions on religious practice are allowed only when the
practice in question poses substantial risk to the public interest. Persons who hold the beliefs that I have
described may continue to do so without fear of punishment. We must ask, however, to what extent these
beliefs may be permitted to drive public policy. What is the risk? Where do justice and morality lie?
If those who deny the science of
climate change are correct, then there is no risk. No matter what we do, Earth will continue to
produce abundant foodstuffs, the oceans will renew themselves and continue to
absorb whatever we choose to discard in them, species will flourish without
danger of extinction. Life will continue as we know it for the foreseeable
future, and sooner or later it will end in glory with the second coming of
Christ.
If those who warn of impending danger
are correct, however, we have little time remaining to repent of our profligate
ways. Bill McKibben, speaking recently
at Franklin and Marshall College, quoted NASA scientist James Hansen as saying
that we have at best sixteen more years to bring our discharge of carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere under control.
And even if we succeed, the cumulative effects of what we have already
done cannot be reversed in less than a hundred years. By that time many species will have been lost
and many beings will have suffered immense hardship.
The necessity of making a choice and
taking action brings us again to the gospel.
The ones who would suffer the most, the ones most vulnerable to the rise
in sea level, the collapse of fisheries, the ever-more-frequent droughts,
flooding, and severe storms, are the poor, the “least of these” with whose care
Jesus charged his followers. Is it
ethical – is it even Christian – to take the chance that the deniers are
correct, and do nothing? Jesus had harsh
words for those who refused to listen to the prophets of old. People like Bill McKibben and James Hansen
are our modern-day prophets, calling us to turn again, and act responsibly to
care for God’s good creation.
Let those who have ears to hear....
ReplyDelete